patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Christie Signs Bill Inspired by Barnegat Accident Photo Case

Law will protect accident victims' privacy rights, sponsors say

 

When Cathy Bates was fatally injured in an automobile accident in 2009, her family was devastated. But it's what happened after the head-on crash on Route 72 in Barnegat that spurred a bill which was signed into law this week by Gov. Chris Christie.

Bates, a 40-year-old Manchester woman, was killed Oct. 23, 2009. At the accident scene, it was discovered that a volunteer first responder took photos of her which were posted on Facebook before her family members had even been notified of what had happened.

"Instantly, it was on the Internet," said Diane Brown, Cathy Bates' sister. "It was hours before my mom even found out it was my sister."

"You assume that someone's common sense and integrity would come into play," said Brown. "We thought, 'They posted pictures on the Internet?' That's not right. Can't they be arrested?"

But there were no laws on the books prohibiting the posting of such images at the time. While the practice may have violated the protocol of the first aid squad, there would be no criminal or civil repercussions available in such a case.

Since the accident which claimed her daughter's life, Lucille Bates-Wickward, a resident of Stafford Township's Warren Grove section, and her family members have lobbied state lawmakers to pass a law prohibiting first responders from distributing photos or recordings of an accident victim without the victim's or family's permission.

"We asked for help in getting something passed so another family wouldn't have to go through this," said Brown.

On Tuesday, Gov. Chris Christie signed a bill sponsored by Sen. Chris Connors and Assembly members Brian Rumpf and DiAnne Gove (all R-Ocean) which made distributing such photographs or recordings illegal.

"The enactment of this legislation marks a significant achievement in protecting victims’ privacy rights by updating state law to reflect the realities of today’s rapidly expanding and evolving social media," the legislative delegation said in a statement Wednesday.

"Not surprisingly, many first responders we have spoken with on this issue were incensed and offended by what took place in the case of Mrs. Bates-Wickward and her family."

First responders who are present at the scene of a motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation to provide assistance are prohibited from "photographing, filming, videotaping, recording, or otherwise reproducing in any manner, the image of a person being provided medical care or other assistance, except in accordance with applicable rules, regulations, or operating procedures of the agency employing the first responder," the law states.

The law also prohibits first responders from distributing any images of victims that are captured unless written permission is provided by the accident victim or the victim's next-of-kin. There are exceptions for certain law enforcement and insurance purposes, as well as in the case of a court order that forces the release of images.

Violating the law could earn a first responder six months in jail and a $1,000 fine, as well as the potential of being sued in civil court.

Brown on Wednesday afternoon expressed her thanks to the local legislators, as well as Assemblywoman Nancy Munoz (R-Union) and the "hundreds of people who wrote the governor" asking him to sign the bill into law.

"People can make a difference and can change things," Brown said.

Related Topics: Cathy Bates, Chris Christie, and barnegat nj news

Sal Sorce

2:51 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Interesting ... it was rumored that the young motorcyclist that
was killed with Freeholder Kelly, a delay was because his leg could
not be found ... it was found by a K- dog who located up in a
tree ... what a nightmare ...
law too late but does it help to maintain transparency or helping
a family with potential conflicting findings???

Reply

Larry Cataldo

7:46 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

COME ON where doz the "right to know" supercide common decentcy,,,,the first responders are there for help,,,,not take pictures, these are some SICK people , instead of taking pictures, you need to be throwing up,,, and thinking about the family!!!!!

Reply

Mac

6:14 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

What is truly sad about this law is that it is needed at all. While I appreciate the efforts of all involved in eliminating such crass actions, I don't believe state government can pick and choose who First Amendment rights apply to and/or under what conditions they can be applied or restricted. There is nothing to stop any bystander from doing the same thing when everything takes place on public property. My thoughts are the state would be more successful in curbing such practices by incorporating a ban on them into any licenses and certificates necessary to perform these emergency response services.

Reply

Opinionated

9:53 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012

It's sad such a law had to be made in the first place. But my question is: Why would such a person be hired as a First Responder at all? Ok, maybe the employer had no inkling. This responder should be fired unless they have been already and any accreditation they have/had should be revoked.

Reply

dizzylucy

2:34 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

I can't believe they needed to make this a law to begin with, that there are people out there who would do such a thing. It's utterly despicable - how would that person who took the photo felt if it was their loved one? At least now everyone is aware, and if someone is cruel enough to do that again, there's some recourse for punishment.
I applaud Cathy's family for their efforts to protect others from going through what they had to. I'm sure she would be proud of their dedication and hard work to make things better.

Reply

deathpenaltyforcopkillers

4:28 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Hope the APP is reading this. Don't know how many times they were the first ones on the scene of a bad accident trying to shoot pictures and/or trying to cross crime scene tape.

Reply

Opinionated

10:29 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Don't know why the APP needs to bother. Most of us only get their paper for the weekend ads and coupons. They're long gone.

Reply

John Esche

12:26 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012

Hard cases make bad law. Trust a right wing nut like Christie to rush to sign a clearly unConstitutional piece of legislation like this knowing it will make him look momentarily sensitive without considering all the real world implications. The photos in question were doubtless in bad taste, but may have done more to curb bad driving than all the extra police Christie won't bother to fund training for.

Reply

Leave a comment