patching...
Breaking: Belmar's Boardwalk is Open For Summer »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Council Approves Affordable Housing Spending Plan at Special Meeting

Plan outlines how $1.5 million in expenditures will be allocated through 2018

Members of Manchester's Township Council approved the township's $1.5 million affordable housing spending plan during a special meeting held Monday evening. 

The special meeting was scheduled based on the belief that the spending plan had to be adopted before July 18 — four years after a 2008 law requiring all municipalities that have collected development fees to commit them to a plan. The council did have more leeway with the date, which was discovered after the meeting was set.

"Since we had already scheduled the meeting because of that deadline, we kept the meeting because we didn't want people to show up and find a sign that said we're not having the meeting," said Council President Craig Wallis.

The plan, which was developed by Thomas Planning Associates, is required by the state Council on Affordable Housing. It is also the first formal report required on how the township will spend this money, which is collected through development fees from the construction of residential and non-residential homes. That money has been deposited in the Manchester Township Affordable Housing Trust Fund, authorized by ordinance in 2002. 

"We've never done it before so we have to come up with a written plan," said Business Administrator Elena Zsoldos. "In the past we didn't have to have this spending plan outlined so specific, but now COAH requires it."

According to the 11-page document, the trust fund already contains $994,623. Another $525,000 of projected revenue, which comes from development fees and interest, is expected through 2018. Of that, $365,678 has been set for independent living, which includes funding for Homes for All and Habitat for Humanity, $237,500 is allocated for rehabilitation of "several" low and moderate income units, $706,822 will be used for affordability assistance and $209,624 goes toward administration costs. 

This is also the first time that the state Division of Community Affairs wanted to approve the spending plan as well, Wallis said. 

Township administrators will next work out the eligibility requirements for those who can apply, based on what COAH outlines.

"[The application process] is still in its infancy stage," Zsoldos said. "We plan on doing some advertisement and it will operate on a first-come, first-serve basis."

The requirements, which are anticipated to be finalized within the "next few months," will be adopted through the council, so the information will be public, Zsoldos said. 

A second resolution authorizing an escrow agreement between Manchester, DCA and TD Bank was also approved for the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. All council members voted affirmatively for the spending plan and escrow agreement, except for Vice President Brendan Weiner who was absent. 

"What this is is making an agreement between us, the state and TD Bank. We have our special fund there," Wallis said. 

Related Topics: Affordable Housing Spending Plan and manchester township council

Don Gottwerth

8:08 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

This law should never have happened. Nothing more than a rip-off of the citizens who could be forced to have housing built in our neighborhoods that would invite low-rent housing and overcrowded schools, which it leads to expenditures by municipalities whether you like it or not. So in Whiting, we're getting a car wash on Lacey Road between two churches, which we didn't ask for at the same time we have an abandoned gas station under constant remediation. Now we could get forced mixed housing complete with legal muggings to boot. My question is, wasn't there one, at least, no vote on the council? Foresight is lacking on this body.

Reply

Bryan

8:31 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

How about talking more about the appartment complex being proposed accross from town hall, some for vets and some for low income. They want to put it across from well fargo and town hall, maybe they will find pine snake skins and stop it like the walmart!

Reply
Comment_arrow

WhitingBoy

11:23 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

If any of this money is earmarked for that project to help defray the cost for those builders, there will be problems. Those builders were the biggest contributors to the Mayor and three council members. If they voted not only to change the law for the project, but then give them money, it will be an incredible travesty.

ballyjduf

10:04 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Check Fressola's bank account

Reply
Comment_arrow

ballyjduf

10:05 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

might have been paid in cash

Don Gottwerth

10:14 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

This law goes back several years and I doubt builder money is involved with the existing law. This is social engineering that was born out of the era of school funding for failing school districts.Steve Lonegan speaks of this bombastic drive to ghettoize every corner of NJ, and I know Christie tried to drive this law into its grave but pro-ghetto tyrants in Trenton killed that attempt. I know, because I was in Irvington and Newark's environment at the outset, originally named Mt. Laurel.

Reply

Donald J Borst

2:28 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

The existing town council will approve anything that crosses their desks. It's the good old boys club and none of them are ever affected by anything that they approve. Unless it is beneficial to them. We're just here to pay the taxes, which support it all, and keep our mouths shut.

Reply

Don Gottwerth

5:15 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

A board member in V-2 once said, "I didn't move from a city to a city, and that is what Whiting is becoming. And what a mess, in its attempts, when you look at the Ocean County-financed road project on Routes 530 and Lacey Road mid-town mess that has been made by its engineers who should be fired for ineptness, and its not Manchester folks. I keep saying, what should they have been doing during the winter that we didn't have, for the road construction and alignments. Our council members at least should have demanded public meetings and explanations, but the planning board was too busy coming up with a car wash and a Dunkin Doughnuts plus, yet to come down on our road work projects.

Reply

Leave a comment