patching...
Breaking: Minutes From Seaside Heights, Sandy's Destruction Still Apparent »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

State Budget: Feds on Hook for Sandy Recovery

The governor's proposed budget includes about $40 million in Sandy-related supplemental aid.

 

New Jersey’s recovery following Hurricane Sandy will come, officials and legislators at Tuesday’s budget introduction at the Statehouse in Trenton said, just don’t expect the state to pay for it.

In Gov. Chris Christie’s proposed $32.9 billion budget, only about $40 million has been set aside for Sandy-related recovery, all of it coming in the form of supplemental aid. Its intended use will only be as a stopgap during the process of the state’s securing aid for various recovery efforts.

The negligible sum will have little impact on the state’s budget, according to New Jersey Treasurer Andrew Sidamon-Eristoff. Instead, the state will lean on the federal government to cover the costs of New Jersey’s recovery, which is expected to reach tens of billions of dollars.

In January, the U.S. House of Representatives approved approximately $50.7 billion in Hurricane Sandy recovery aid. That money is expected to reach New Jersey residents in the form of Community Development Block Grants and other funding sources as soon as April.

There are some concerns that sequestration could impact the federal recovery aid intended for New Jersey. Should the White House and Congress fail to reach a deal on spending cuts, various departments in New Jersey could be aversely impacted.

Sandy relief would also be cut to some degree, though Sidamon-Eristoff said he was unaware of any specifics.

Currently, there are no plans to amend the state’s budget to account for the possibility of lost Sandy aid.

Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon, R-13, who represents some of the areas hardest hit by Sandy said the state’s contribution in terms of supplemental aid is irrelevant. The governor, he said, has rightly laid the disaster recovery bill at the feet of the federal government, charging them with the cost of restoring the shore.

No one, he said, should infer anything from the supplemental aid total. It exists only as a last resort stopgap in the fed-funded rebuilding effort.

Sidamon-Eristoff said the state’s municipalities and districts should look to the federal government first and foremost when it comes to seeking aid or applying for recovery loans. The state Department of Community Affairs could conceivably distribute the supplemental aid to towns in need, though he said it would only be as a second, or tertiary, option.

The $40 million could also be used for infrastructure projects and small business aid.

Overall, Sidamon Eristoff said, Sandy wouldn’t especially impact the State’s budget. New Jersey would see a revenue shortfall from its previous estimate, though revenue growth has continued following Sandy.

In terms of revenue growth – estimated to grow by 4.9 percent in fiscal year 2014 – O’Scanlon said it’s on the rise following Sandy, trending in the right direction and signaling positive momentum during what could have been a sluggish economic period.

Sidamon-Eristoff said following a couple of down months. the state has seen revenue growth after Sandy. He said he believes the overall impact of Sandy would be modest and that the recovery and reconstruction effort could actually lead to a positive bump in revenue overall.

“I’m not sure there will be a significant material impact,” he said of Sandy’s role in the state’s revenue. Sidamon-Eristoff said he even anticipates a rebound occurring in upcoming fiscal year that will offset any revenue hiccups suffered during Sandy. 

About this column: News and essential information about Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey. Related Topics: Hurricane Sandy and State Budget

John B Taxpayer

3:42 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Stop selling us on drinking the Kool-Aid of sequestration! This is a bull Crap scam pressed by Obama (the Renegger) It was his deal now he's saying we're all gonna die he has a $15 billion dollar increase in his budget! NO reduction in spending. the patch plays right into his lies!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Capo

4:19 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The funny thing was they set this up because they thought it would force congress to do their jobs.....LMFAO

Comment_arrow

capta320

8:54 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Hey John B They ALL in DC are to blame..How about stop paying all of the politicians or better yet pay them min wage see if they can live on it.. Get over the fact Pres Obama won the election..BIG money from Lobby cant buy a President.... Yes we have a African American President..Respect the Office. ITS 2013...Lets get the USA back on track and stop the Grandstanding..The American People spoke in 2012 Election. Tea Baggers can go home now.. GOP and DEMs need to work together.. Reagan did it Bush 1 did it ..

Comment_arrow

GB Shore

9:53 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

That's right capta320...they are all to blame...but the President is the one who is supposed to be leading and this guy FAILS big time as a leader. As a matter of fact, he perpetuates the gridlock in Washington because he is more interested in winning and having his way than he is in getting both sides together. Any moron can see that and the fact that you bring up race is ridiculous....

George

3:51 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

We should be offered 105% of pre-flood home values by FEMA & Gov. Christie, too!

"Gov. Cuomo said yesterday that 169 of 192 residents of Staten Island’s storm devastated Oakwood Beach have taken him up on his offer to buy out their Sandy-ravaged homes.

"The people who live in the battered neighborhood have been enticed by a deal that will pay them 100 percent of their damaged home’s prestorm market value — plus 5 percent if the homeowners stay on Staten Island, Cuomo said. The feds will pick up 75 percent of the tab."

The state could resell the homes to those who can afford to raise them, or pay big bucks for flood insurance every year, or demolish them and build new homes. Those sales would more than pay back the state's 25% share. How about it, Gov?

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

4:09 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Governor Cuomo did not select Fema to do his job and it is now beginning to show up in the results. Had Christie hunkered down and called on all sorts of NJ resources and experts he could have helped the people of NJ.

Instead, he decided to dump us all because he believes, maybe correctly, that he doesn't need our votes in this next election. Trouble is, when he aims for the White House, we who he has disenfranchised will be scattered around the nation in lower tax paying States where we will stand up and explain just what kind of government this man provided when a crisis hit.

And I did vote for him but one fooled .....

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

4:12 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

We who live on a Bay and have been rated as living in a V zone will be lucky to get out of here alive. We will have to either face bankruptcy or pay off mortgages for the homes we can no longer afford because we are all fema non-compliant and will be told to pay $2000 a MONTH for flood insurance which doesn't even pay off.

People on Staten Island are receiving decent treatment. We simply are being shafted.

Comment_arrow

MS2012

6:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

You cannot compare 169 homes versus what happened to the Jersey Shore. 1200 homes alone in the Highlands, NJ were ruined. Demoncrats love the uneducated voter.

Comment_arrow

NJarhead

7:54 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

@MS2012: Correct!
How many people visit Staten Island each summer???
I especially loved the "FEMA doing his job for him" part.

Comment_arrow

.

12:00 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

@foggyworld. That is because New York has a real governor. One who really cares about the people and what they need.

Comment_arrow

Quaghogdigger

11:32 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

And they still need to get those 23 holdouts to go with the plan, or its a no-go....They want to wipe the oakwood beach section clean, and not rebuild there.

foggyworld

3:58 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Sounds as if we really don't need a State government after all. It's all up to federal agencies and local politicians neither of which have surpluses in their bank accounts.

And love the rocket scientist who thinks this State's economy won't be impacted by the storm. I know. It's all George Bush's fault. Christie is a heck of a fast learner.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Capo

4:22 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Good point...in his speech today Cristie said there are 20,000 fewer government jobs today that last administration. If thats true, I havent seen any reduction in services.....keep cutting. We don't need big government.

Comment_arrow

Robert Miller

6:07 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Hi Foggyworld! I lived in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina and lost 2 homes. I'm familiar with ICC, Block Grants, SRL Grants and "God help you!", the extremely disfunctional HMGP program. All Staten Island has received so far are promises from politicians. They have not been treated any better than NJ. Don't .bet your futures on this political rhetoric. I have friends still waiting on promised HMGP funding 8 years after Katrina! It took Louisiana 3 years just to start releasing the elevation grants so homes could be rebuilt. Keep in mind, if you start construction on your home before approval for HMGP, your disqualified! I truly hope NJ has a more efficient State and Local government.

Mrs. NJarhead

3:59 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The government should just plow them down and recycle the wood for boardwalks so that the sierra club is satisfied. The people can be relocated to internment camps out west under the homestead acts there is plenty of unused land. Just be careful if you want a sewer system you may upset some of these tools from holmdel that have sewers but dont want anyone else to.

Reply

Dr. Ronald A. DeLanzo Jr.

4:00 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Small business owners in Ocean City Nj will never see a dime.

Reply

foggyworld

4:03 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I think they should plow the houses down with we the soon to be removed and bankrupted, in them. All we have gotten is more unreachable rules and regulations that will force way too many of the middle class into poverty unnecessarily. This is the Governor who said that the residents' voices should be heard. By whom? Nobody has listened to us for four months.

Reply

John B Taxpayer

4:15 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Chris, ole boy is now OFFICIALLY a GOOD ole boy!
Soul sold to the devil!

Reply
Comment_arrow

NJ resident

4:58 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

jUST WONDERING - IS THE STATE DOING ITS SHARE OF FUNDING PENSIONS YET? OR, HAS THAT PROBLEM BEEN "SOLVED" BY LOWERING THE PENSION OBLIGATIONS AND DOING NOTHING TO MEET THE STATE'S OBLIGATIONS?

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

5:26 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Added to the budget, however, is his commitment to add to NJ's medicaid bill by signing the State up for the full nine yard package of Obamacare.

I'm beginning to think Snooki ought to run for Governor. At least she did something for the people of NJ by fundraising.

John B Taxpayer

4:25 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The problem is the Senate, who refuses to pass a budget.... so they can spend limitlessly!
Start with the cadavor,Gazillionare Lautenburg and that child scewin Menendez (Oh, darn, did I forget to pay you back that $58k, for that trip to the Dominican Republic?)
as 2 useless gravy train riders! Useless- as descibed in the dictionary...

Reply

re-tired

5:22 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The Gov. thinks he can keep passing off everything on someone else. He passed state aid for the towns off to the towns , now as a result of his policy and his "2%" CAP ON TAXES MY TAX BILL IS UP $1200 in 3 yrs . Two yrs since I saw a rebate and now a delay and the cost of sandy . His acceptance of the FEMA maps is the low point of his administration !

Reply

foggyworld

5:27 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Methinks he may be an Obamacrat in disguise. It's the last two words that really bother me.

Reply

Skitch

6:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I can still remember one of the first news broadcasts made by Christie right after the storm occurred. He said to a little girl who was upset about the damage "Don't worry, the adults are in charge now". meaning the parents. I as a parent of a completely flooded out home in BHW have NEVER been in charge. Those who are in charge are Christie, the flood adjusters, the insurance carriers, the federal government and our elected township officials. I am being told what i can and can't do with my own property, i am being told i can have this, but can't have that. I am sick to death of everything. I am being made to jump thru hoops just to have my house back to the way it was prior to the storm. Even then I am still being shafted by everyone involved. I have done everything that i have been asked to do. I have researched everything. I have a flood policy with full coverage and more than enough to cover my substantial loss. Here i am sitting more than 4 months after the storm still waiting to settle my claim and still waiting for the flood adjuster to be fair about my repair costs. Funny. I used to like Christie. Yesterday i had a republican volunteer knock on my door asking me to sign a petition or something to reelect Christie. Before I slammed the door in her face, I reminder her that he was one of the reasons i was so miserable to begin with. This whole ordeal has been a real eye opener for me and how my local, state and federal governments really work.

Reply

richard Beem

7:01 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I don't particularly like any politician. But people need to stop looking for help. Help yourselves. One guy here is asking the state to pay 105% of home value pre-sandy to
Relocate. Another is saying accepting FEMA maps is wrong. Guess what, can't afford to rebuild? Try moving. Living by the water is a luxury, not a right. Frankly NJ is out of hand with over development on the water. Hopefully many of these people will not be allowed to rebuild. Certainly not if they can't pay for it themselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Skitch

8:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

@ Richard. I am rebuilding my house at a cost of 160k out of my own pocket. This should not be happening when i have bought and paid for a flood policy for many, many years. I should not have to pay 160k out of pocket when i purchased more than enough insurance coverage to protect my assets. It is not my fault that FEMA, the NFIP or the federal government squandered my money on other uninsured risks and they are now broke. When I buy and pay for coverage in exchange for a premium I expect to be covered. I don't expect to be covered for less than a 1/4 of the cost of my damage. I and the federal government signed a contract the minute i applied for and they accepted my policy and my premuim. So as you say, I am now helping myself and paying out of pocket for my loss but this is not the end for me. I will be filing suit against all those involved in my claim for damages. You just think that it is easy to get up and relocate. Think again. Some of us work here, some of us were raised here and have family here (elderly) and more importantly our houses are ruined. We can't sell them the way they are without losing everything that we put into them. In addition most of us require the money from the sale to invest in another home or to relocate. Most of us just don't have the money sitting in our bank accounts to invest in another property without paying off the house that we currently own. Trust me i've looked at this situation rationally from all angles.

Comment_arrow

capta320

9:03 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I guess your house was not leveled by Sandy.. We STILL are paying Prop Tax and Mortgage on a house that is totally gone.plus rental for place to live. But don t worry BIG WALL Street crooks will come in and buy up houses that cant be rebuilt or have been foreclosed by the JP Morgan Chase crooks..And rebuild for the 1 % to enjoy waterfront mansions Flip them and make a killing...If it was YOUR HOUSE you would be first in line..give me a break..you drank too much tea party Kool Aid and listen too many hours to your boy Rush Oxycodone Limbaugh..

Comment_arrow

Martin

12:06 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

We don't have luxury houses. We're not oceanfront. Middle-class homeowners miles from the beach were flooded. We paid insurance premiums for decades have have nothing to show for it. Now FEMA imposes $50,000-$150,000 house-raising mandates and $30,000-a-year insurance costs on us. Don't you see the injustice of all that?

That's why we're mad. That's why you should get the facts at Facebook.com/StopFemaNow or www.StopFemaNow.com.

Join us in fighting the ridiculous new requirements that are being imposed to bail FEMA out of its 2005 Katrina-bungle debt.

Comment_arrow

proud

3:08 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

@richard Beem, do you really think "moving" is a solution for forty percent (2in5) of New Jerseyans and 18 plus percent (1in5) of Americans that no doubt live luxuriously. think about it.

www.stopfemanow.com

foggyworld

7:50 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

He is asking for that particular amount because that is exactly what Governor Cuomo is arranging for those whose homes were lost to Sandy on Staten Island. But Governor Cuomo did not abdicate to FEMA the way Christie did.

The Fema maps are out of date by 30 years and no one can afford to either rebuild or repair in the V zone attached to any areas on the western side of a Bay that is at its very deepest points 10' down. That labeling which is new means that most likely there isn't an in-compliance home on the entire western coast while some parts of the barrier islands that are on top of the ocean have been given much gentler codes and treatment. Four houses in my neighborhood voluntarily built on 10' pilings and came through the storm dry. Now, however, that isn't good enough for Fema who wants us to go up to 13 unnecessary feet at a cost of at least $100,000 per house.

We all paid heavy insurance premiums for our homes and in return Fema passed out SBA (?) LOAN applications so that instead of insurance money we would be adding another payment on top of our existing mortgages and our taxes will go way up as will our flood insurance which this go round proved to be a joke - and not a funny one: it was a scam.

It is a luxury but the price now means that only the super rich, the one percenters, will be able to live even on this western shore of a Bay. And again, we have paid heavy taxes all the way along and are being given the Catch 22 shaft of all time.

Reply

re-tired

8:01 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Mr beem ,you are missing the point entirely we are not rich people on the west side of the bay,but sub middle class longtime taxpayers who have struggled to build our "dream houses" at the shore .We are not looking for help to rebuild from fema only the insurance which was paid for by some. Now we are being asked to further elevate our homes .I have 8 steps up to my door and am elderly. To elevate to fema height would require 15 steps and 14 ft pilings not very practical .V-zone has a ring of death about it for the shore . Oh ,I suffered no loss from sandy except for my vehicles .It is not charity we are looking for ,only fairness from the state and feds. Try going to "stopfemanow.com " and see our issues !

Reply

diana man

8:26 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

we have become the whipping area. many other communities in other states received better treatments an the maps might not have changed so drastic as our.the problem is all the good old boys club never stopped spending.all of them spend like they own the funds,an they do,they vote on spending ,giving to one group or the others.perhaps they need to be tossed out by all of Americans.we are still the bigger group by numbers.lol

Reply
Comment_arrow

capta320

9:10 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

And NJ voted for whom in 2008 and 2012.. Yes President Obama..now we are being punished by the Tea Party in Congress..I guess the KOCH Brothers are again pulling TEA Party Members of Congress Strings They want it their way for the BIG $$$$ they invested in the Tea Baggers. Time to get BIG MONEY out of OUR Government..

foggyworld

8:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

But the reason we are the whipping area is that the Governor quickly delegated his responsibilities and powers to Fema where none of the other Governors did. Those other Governors have been busy tamping down and out some of Fema's more inane requirements for rebuilding and repair while our Governor from the get go just signed all of us up to report to Fema.

Campaigning seems to be his thing but it really isn't a talent that is needed in a time of crisis either here or in Washington where he seems to think he is heading.

Reply

capta320

9:12 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

If SANDY was in FLA Marco Rubio would have all money he needed within days after the storm..

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

5:04 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Like Bush's pals in Texas got their $$$ 10 days after Katrina.

boromom

8:09 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Governor is actually smart...making the federal government pay for just about everything so New Jerseyans don't...Not saying its right...just smart. He takes the responsibility off of him to give it to someone else!

Reply
Comment_arrow

foggyworld

2:21 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The federal government isn't paying for just about everything at all. Many of us paid flood insurance premiums for decades and are receiving zilch. So why this is smart, I'm not sure unless you are a one percenter who can profit from the tragedy of others.

Spooner

11:10 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

...as they say: "the proof is in the pudding" You listen too to many politicians BS?

Reply

Alicia78

1:44 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

I would like to know why anyone has to turn to the government for any of the costs. That is what insurance is for and these people have been paying...the government needs to do something about making these insurance companies pay up and what happened to the billions in donations? Between the red cross, 2 major benefit concerts and every restaurant and store asking for donations...where is it all???

Reply

proud

3:57 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

@ Alicia78,in the case of flood insurance, the insurance companies ARE the government. The insurance companies you refer to are service providers for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which essentially renders flood insurance socialized. As to charities, all too often they act the government does, picking meat from the bones and leaving only a carcass for their ultimate recipients, be they a victim and/or a taxpayer. Same thing really.

www.stopfemanow.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

JEN G

4:19 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

@Alicia......you are 100% right!!!!!!! People don't realize that it's the government that holds your flood policy............you agent whether it be allstate, travellers, etc is just the middle man!!!!!!!! They do not hold your premiums the government does. The government (FEMA) gives out money to those who were affected by the flood but don't carry flood insurance and those of us who have been paying for years get pushed to the back burner. I am so sick of how this flood insurances works!!!! It is a rip off just like everything else our government makes us pay in to!!!!!!

proud

5:09 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Hanging off a hook in my closet, I have a pair of jeans with four pockets. One for the municipal government; one for the county government ;one for the state government;and, one for the federal government (rear pocket). Each pocket wants money from the other pockets. If when the jeans have worn out and are in need of retirement,and the pockets are all empty, what difference does it make who took what from whom?

Reply

GB Shore

5:36 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The insurance companies write the policies for flood insurance using rate table and rules and regs that they provide. the rpoblem is that there is a disparity in rates when you compare. Why? Because many companies, even big ones like State Farm and Allstate don't do a lot of flood, so they do not know HOW to write the RIGHT policy based on the information at hand. So, if it is not written correctly, you wind up with a premium that is incorrect for your home at a rate that is probably too much. I spoke with my agent today. Details coming in another post following this.

Reply

GB Shore

5:42 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

First, if your home was built BEFORE Flood Maps were put in place (1974) you are grandfathered in and will NOT have to raise your home or face exhorbitant premiums (for homes that were not destroyed); Second, if your home was built after 1974, you should ensure that your policy is rated at the time it was built in accordance with the rulkes, regs and elevations AT THE TIME IT WAS BUILT. If it was (like mine was) I will NOT have to raise my house and my premiums will NOT go thru the roof. Lastly, if you house WAS destroyed or severely compromised and you have to rebuild, you HAVE to comply with the new elevations. This makes sense and not sure why anyone would NOT want to raise it. I hope this clears up all the mis-information that is going on out there. The key is to have a carrier who KNOWS how to write flood insurance plicies so you get the right coverage at the right/best price. I have $260k for my home and another $70k for contents. My premium? $733 per year. If you want someone who knows how to write the policies, contact The Flood Insurance Agency, (406) 755-2838. I've had them for a decade. they know their stuff. I do not work for them and I will not get paid anything for this. I am only trying to help those affected because I have MANY here in my neighborhood who need help.

Reply

proud

6:10 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

@GB Shore, I hope that you are correct, but that is not how it was explained to me. My understanding is that pre FIRM and Post FIRM (after '74 and not substantially improved) are being phased out incrementally until they reach their full actuarial rates (which is an amount that NO ONE can seem to tell me). I called FEMA (oh about fifty times) and they told me to call the NFIP, who in turn told me to call FEMA and on and on... Is it any wonder there is so much confusion out there? I have consulted my own agent, but I think I will contact yours and hope they will take a moment to confirm what you are saying. That would at least be some partial relief for some.

Reply
Comment_arrow

GB Shore

6:57 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

I was told there is pre firm, post firm and new construction. You should call the number I posted to get it for yourself. If they were to raise rates as everyone is fearing, it would be catastrophic. Not sure who you spoke with, but my agent does nothing but flood...

proud

6:13 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Two questions @ GB, what is your effective BFE relative to your advised ABFE? And, in what zone?

Reply
Comment_arrow

GB Shore

7:01 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

My home was originally built in 9/1977. I am in zone A-5. My BFE is 7.0 and my lowest floor is my crawl which is at 4.3....next is my garage which is 6.2 and then there is my living space which is at 7.9. So I am above the grade for my home. As I mentioned, the devil in the details lays with the rules and regs and how they are applied. you REALLY need to talk to the folks who are writing the insurance. The folks I use write Flood for State Farm and All State. Call them...it's why I shared it with everyone.

Rob

7:44 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

GB might be correct ,but when you want to sell it the new people will not be grandfathered in. You should be prepared to live there until you die or sell it so low that it will be considered a knock down and it can be built to new standards what ever they may be. I would call this agencey and get it in writing not by someone over the phone who may not be working there in the near future and you know how that goes, this is what you get. He is not working here any longer , the reason being he was giving out the wrong info----Get it in writing

Reply
Comment_arrow

GB Shore

9:03 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I put the info out there to help...if anyone is skeptical, then 1) call them if you are skeptical or 2) don't use the info. I am fine with these folks as I have used them for a decade. Just trying to help. I'm not looking for advice. I am just trying to help folks who appear to have some very incorrect information. My advice is to call them...clearly, they know a LOT more than any of us do, since Flood Insurance is all they do....

Comment_arrow

proud

9:17 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Thanks for your efforts @ GB Shore. The reality is that much of the "very incorrect information" is generated by FEMA /NFIP.

StopFemaNow.com

Comment_arrow

Dentss Dunnagun

8:18 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

GB you are totally correct ...my house was built in 1948 ,I have been grandfathered since I lived here ....the next buyer will be grandfathered as well ...as long as he doesn't tear the house down and rebuild ,of course then he could raise the elevation

GB Shore

9:22 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

You're welcome Proud. Thanks.

Reply

anonymous

10:41 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Here are some rate table I found. The first is from the NFIP. The second is from a gooogle search about flood rates released by Nags Head, NC but references the Briggs Water Act.
http://www.nfipiservice.com/Stakeholder/pdf/bulletin/w-12028.pdf

http://www.nagsheadnc.gov/vertical/sites/%7BB2CB0823-BC26-47E7-B6B6-37D19957B4E1%7D/uploads/2012_NFIP_changes_12-17-2012.pdf

Reply

1stcav

9:06 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

I'm, as well as others are soooo confused by all these old rules, new rules, no flood Ins. vs Flood ins, and getting screwed....The bank won't release funds YOUR ins. co payed , that was because YOU payed the premiums ( It's YOUR money- not the banks) If the bank payed the premiums , then they can hold the money, but NOT when I payed the bill !!!!!! This IS America , not IRAQ ( which we payed for come to think of it ). Now WE need help , so how much is IRAQ sending back to NJ...Look into that Sen. Menendez , in between your trips la la land of the young Ho's..the D.R. via Fla.

Reply

1stcav

9:13 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

Googled; Flood Insurance Agency and the info I wanted came up for the Condo. unit , as they cover the Build , but from where ( the outer , 2x4's and sheathing ) I need for sheet rock into unit ...

Reply

GB Shore

9:39 am on Monday, March 4, 2013

@1stcav, call the number I gave you and ask for Justin, (406) 755-2838.

Reply

Rich Wieland

12:15 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013

Monmouth County residents: In at least one Shore town, councilmen are confronting the hardships imposed by FEMA, asserting that the bureaucrats mandating those astronomical expenses should pay for them! http://brick.patch.com/articles/brick-officials-feds-should-fund-all-house-raisings

Flood-zone homeowners in NY are being offered buyouts -- with 75% of the cost paid by FEMA. The prices are at pre-flood values. (FEMA's erroneous maps, over-reaching house-raising elevations and exorbitant annual insurance costs have devalued our houses 30% to 50%!)

All along the Shore, there's a grassroots uprising against the 2012 Biggert-Waters Act that empowered FEMA to cause more damage than Sandy did: StopFemaNow.com ==> or ==> Facebook.com/StopFemaNow

Come to a 1-hour meeting this Saturday, March 9th, 3PM at the Silverton First Aid Squad, 86 Maine St. (like the state), Toms River.

Residents of all coastal towns are invited. Up to 20% of all US residents are affected by FEMA's expanding flood zones and onerous requirements and expenses. Our voices will be heard from Trenton to Washington!

Reply

Leave a comment