patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Congressional Republicans Advance 'Medicare-Killing' Budget

“A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned how to walk forward."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

Republicans in Congress are determined to advance a “Medicare-killing” budget. For conservatives, the purpose and benefits of Medicare to the 40 million Americans age 65 and older are ignored as the GOP continues it’s relentless attack against this Social Security Health Insurance program.

Last year Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) proposed that Medicare be replaced by a fully privatized plan, it was a disaster for the GOP as those 65 years and older rallied against the Republican onslaught. Now, just last week, Ryan introduced a sequel to his earlier assault on Medicare as he put forward his Path to Prosperity, Medicare-Killing fiscal plan.

Ryan conveniently ignores the fact that Medicare works for America and must be protected. This program provides 47 million seniors and disabled Americans with access to affordable and life sustaining treatments and medicines. Before Congress created Medicare in 1965, more than half of American seniors did not have health insurance due to un-affordable cost. Sick, elderly, patients were treated like second class citizens. Many aging Americans without family to care for them became destitute, or out on the street, without critical health care. Republicans like Ryan want to return America to this disgraceful time.

Ryan also proposes to take from seniors the provision of the Affordable Health Care Act that cuts the cost of prescription drugs for millions of Medicare patients, including the new 50 percent discount on brand name drugs for seniors and people with disabilities in the “donut hole." Already, nearly 900,000 patients have used the discounts and saved $461 million.

Ryan’s budget proposal has nothing to do with fairness, instead it provides massive tax breaks for the richest 1 percent and preserves the huge give-aways to “Big Oil," while at the same time shifting the burden of deficit reduction to the middle class and seniors citizens. Once again, the conservative Republicans fail to ask the rich to make sacrifices but instead proposes to end guaranteed health coverage under Medicare and shred this critical safety net for the middle class.

Alan K

9:30 pm on Friday, March 30, 2012

Mr Griffiths says "Republicans like Ryan want to return America to this disgraceful time." Rep. Ryan is not proposing that seniors be denied health coverage. He has plans to make Medicare a private entity, not a government entitlement program. Articles like this try to create class warfare and get votes for Democrat candidates. I'm hoping it doesn't work.

Reply

Tom Spano

8:25 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Why do Liberals always thing everything is affordable as long as someone else is paying the bill?

Reply

Bob Griffiths

9:48 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Conservative republicans are unbelievable in their ignorance toward Social Security. Conservatives are constantly helping BILLIONAIRES with bailouts, off-shore tax havens, and Big Oil subsidies, yet the conservatives tell taxpayers that have worked hard all their lives and PAID into the Social Security System all their working lives that they are “greedy” for now collecting the benefits from a system they paid into. Such hypocrites the conservatives are.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Bressman

3:02 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

It was the Republicans and the Democrats who borrowed from social security and then put all those iou's in the Social Security fund, if I had the money I put in and the money my employer put in to SS I'd be a millionaire, somehow government programs just don't work, as for medicare it was the Democrats who decided to cut 500 million out of medicare to pay for Obamacare and how about those extra taxes that everyone is going to have to pay that are hidden away in the Obamacare bill, I know you don't like Republicans, but come on man! A few more years we'll be like Greece, when nobody will lend to us and the only way they will lend to us is if we cut our government
benefits by 20 or 30%, I hope you and those people we have inWashington wake up before that happens.

JR

11:05 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Amazing. Out of three comments, all three are negative, only one rebuts Mr. Griffiths commentst with any kind of a contrasting view, and one is a personal attack.

I can think of fewer things than I would rather see my tax money spent on than healthcare. People act like the money is going to provide medicare to people in Australia. We are using our tax dollars in a way that is providing a service for ourselves. We all (hopefully) are going to get old. First your grandparents, then your parents, aunts and uncles, then you. Nobody gets out alive. These tax dollars that come back to us in a form that is tangible...that you can see. It helps us to stay healthy, and when you get sick, doesn't make you cut pills in half because you can't afford them.
We are spending more than a billion dollars a month in Iraq and Afghanistan. Does anybody really think that money is going to save more lives in America, than helping people afford doctors and hospitals ?

Reply

Vince Latchford

1:51 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

It is most disheartening to see extremist views featured on the Brick Patch. Whoever Mr. Griffiths is, he parrots the fact-free "Progressive" line that anyone who opposes their agenda wants to kill seniors and babies, and deny women cancer screenings, all in order to ship cash to the obscenely wealthy and the oil companies.

If you remind them that the current Administration in Washington had total control of the government for 2 years, and used that time to push through an unconstitutional, clumsy, amateurish jumble and call it health care reform, the very first feature of which was to take, listen up now, half a TRILLION dollars away from Medicare, then you're just a .........! Fill in the blank. Moron, hater, racist, corporate pirate, homophobe, religious extremist, etc.

I would not want to see articles from the other extreme any more than I want to see this.The other Party has it's share of equally extreme and ill-informed advocates whose rantings add nothing to the moderate middle-of-the-road majority's search for sensible solutions to the nation's problems.

Reply

Bob Griffiths

8:54 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

At what point did defending Social Security and Medicare become an "extremist view"? Although, there are those on the right that have adamently opposed Social Security and Medicare from the beginning, now that's extreme. As there were also many that saw FDR and the New Deal as extreme. There were those on the right that said the GI Bill was a socialist program, were they extreme? The truth is that anyone that defends workers, unions, seniors, women's rights, or child labor laws are considered extreme by the conservatives.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Bressman

8:16 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

If you were defending those things, I wouldn't care, but your piece isn't about the defense of the programs it's about who you can blame for what has gone wrong. The bailouts were done when the Democrats were in power, not the Republicans, Obama was 100% behind the bailouts and so was Mc cain, the way things turned out, the people that opposed SS were right to oppose it look what happened. Unions years ago were necessary, today, with all the labor laws on the books, they aren't necessary, Unions today bleed the workers with dues, live like kings and use our money to get people re-elected that I don't want elected, I can't even believe you would bring up women's rights, turn on any tv station and you can catch any liberal hack degrading women just for a laugh. What makes you unbelievable is you are so far left and so one sided in your view it distorts the truth of really is going on in America today.

Comment_arrow

Bob Griffiths

9:52 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Based upon the right leaning comments attacking my position in defense of Medicare and Social Security I can better understand the importance of AARP's recent announcement to launch a nation-wide campaign to defend Social Security and Medicare called "You've Earned A Say". Social Security and Medicare are "Bedrocks" for the secure retirement of tens of millions of Americans. Decisions regarding Social Security should not be made behind closed doors in Congress and then simply announced to America. The topic of Social Security and Medicare is too important and seniors in America need to have a clear idea who is supporting the future of Social Security and who seeks to dismantle the programs so that seniors can vote for the best candidates in 2012.

http://www.aarp.org/ws/youve-earned-a-say/

Comment_arrow

Steve

9:16 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012

It's not your defense of the programs that is extreme. It is the means by which you chose to do it. Stop playing politics with it and actually come up with a solution. These programs are useless if they are not solvent, and you know it. Come up with a budget and I will listen. Your federal budget is a joke and you know it. I see you follow the President's playbook and set the discussion up as conservatives are extreme. Extreme is when you ignore the three branches of government. Your President is talking and acting that way. Lecturing the Supreme Court and calling them activists, and ignoring Congress and taking action without them.

You are not actually for equal rights but only for the rights of those that agree with you. If you are really for equal rights, start defending women for more than just "reproductive rights". If you are really for seniors, start defending them for more than just SS and Medicare. If you are really for children, start defending them for more than just labor laws. If you are really for workers rights, defend more than union workers. You won't because that doesn't fit with your agenda.

Securevelope

10:08 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Defending the programs are one thing, your article clearly does not do that. Your article was carefully constructed to bash republicans, lie and give factless information to the ignorant and drive fear into the hearts of seniors making them think they're going to be cut off at the knees. You wrote an attack article plain as day and no matter how you try to spin it, anyone with a 5th grade level of reading comprehension knows what it says.
Maybe you should have written a non-biased article with a good amount of fact thrown in. Just sayin'...

Reply

Securevelope

10:18 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Let me also add that you even took artistic liberties with the title of the bill created by Ryan: "Ryan introduced a sequel to his earlier assault on Medicare as he put forward his Path to Prosperity, Medicare-Killing fiscal plan."

Did he truly call it "Path to Prosperity, Medicare-Killing"? Come now, tell me you didn't make that up for the sole purpose of stirring the pot?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

11:47 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

"artistic liberties"? And the republicans didn't do much worse? I don't remember "Obamacare", being the name of the health care bill. Wasn't that republican "artistic liberties". And you talk about scaring seniors. What about "death panels"? No factual backup for that at all, and yet Palin says it, and every conservative parrots it ad nauseum. "Pulling the plug on grandma" ring a bell? Check Chuck Grassley and the republicans.
Forever, Republicans have used fear as a main component in their tactics. We were told that only they could protect us from our enemies abroad. Last time I checked, George Bush was president for the worst attack on American soil in our history, and President Obama got bin laden.

Vince Latchford

10:59 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Although I enjoy readng the back and forth comments, I still wonder why the Patch decided to feature such a partisan article. Is this an indication of the editor's politics? Or will the Patch look around and locate a right-wing whacko to complain about Karl Marx and interracial marriage, and call the result "Balance"?

Reply

Securevelope

11:10 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

I hope not!
Wait - I like creative writing... can I do it? <giggle>

Reply

Bob Griffiths

12:31 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

“Conservatives define themselves in terms of what they oppose”.
George Will

Oh what a tangled web the Republicans weave, but it is clear that the 2012 Election Cycle is really ALL about the future of Social Security and Medicare. The Presidential Election is actually secondary to the far right hatred for Social Security and it is time for Seniors to realize that fact. Even if Pres. Obama is re-elected, he is only in office for another 4 years, but Social Security will remain for the rest of our lives unless we make the mistake of allowing the Republicans to divert funds and starve both Social Security and Medicare to death. The 2012 election is a referendum on the continued survival of both Social Security and Medicare. The far right has hated both of these programs from the beginning and now they feel they have put up an adequate smoke screen to allow them to sabotage and dismantle Social Security right under the noses of the millions of seniors that depend on both these programs for a secure future. If Seniors allow the Republicans to dismantle Medicare and Social Security it will be the biggest mistake of their lifetime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:15 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Did you happen to read the Sunday Times Magazine about how Obama was willing to make a deal with the Republicans behind closed doors on SSI and Medicare, Medicaid over the debt issue?

Securevelope

12:56 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

JR - I didn't mention republicans for the sole purpose I was commenting on Mr Griffith's article and nothing more. But you know what? Even though someone took artistic liberties with the name of the health care bill and called it Obamacare, it's a far cry from adding in something so erroneous as "Medicare Killing". More spin from someone who has so much hate he can't stay on track of what someone is talking about. Don't let the spin make you too dizzy sir.

Mr. Griffiths, you are so wrong. This year's election is about the economy, not Social Security and Medicare. And just so you know, I'm an independent voter, not some sheep who would follow a party line because she is too blind to think for herself.

I'm not trying to paint the right as the perfect party, I've commented on YOUR ARTICLE and it's content, nothing more. It's sad you don't understand that and continue to keep your spin going.

FYI - if Obama gets re-elected, the economy is going to get worse and more homes will become vacant. It won't be pretty.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

1:09 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Is it a far cry from "pulling the plug on grandma", or"death panels"? I notice you chose to ignore those republican talking points. And these were members of congress saying it, not someone in a local NJ blog. Which was more irresponsible? And I notice that Mr. Griffith put the "Medicare killing" part of his description IN QUOTES, showing that it was his interpretation, and obviously not part of the title.

FYI -Insofar as the economy, maybe you should google "bikini graph", and look at the difference in job creation between the bush administration and now. And this with the most obstructive congress in history.

Securevelope

4:14 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

Oh you are so right.... it's all George Bush's fault.

Reply

JR

9:33 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

I'm glad you agree with me. :)
I do like your dog picture though. I like them much more than most people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christopher Rieth

3:12 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Although Paul Ryan is as much a stooge as Obama, don't you know what the Independent Payment Advisory Board is and what it implies? And don't you know the Constitution well enough to know you can't force people to buy healthcare?

Granted, single-payer would be great, and I would be all for it as long as everyone got the coverage they needed, but under Obamacare that is not going to happen. It was modeled after the N.I.C.E. program of England which denied care to people based on a metric of their supposed usefulness to the economy.

Comment_arrow

Christopher Rieth

3:41 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

The Constitutionality of the bill is defended under the "commerce clause", which states it is a power of Congress "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes". This mandating of insurance cased by the bill is based on the concept that since insurance companies are able to work in several states at a time, they are creating "Commerce... among the several States". This is the crux of the argument and something I doubt the Founders had in mind when creating this aspect of the Constitution. If one thinks only thinks about the whole sentence, it implies that it is talking about tariffs and possibly transportation routes.

To add further to the Founder's intention, I would argue from the points that the Independent Payment Advisory Board and this bill's similarities to the English N.I.C.E. program are two facts that put the bill in contradiction to Constitution's preamble where it states "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union... promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America", since it shows that the general welfare is not being promoted by a board that can cut-off treatment based on an arbitrary metric and certainly not securing liberty for ourselves or our posterity since it mandates the practice.

Christopher Rieth

10:14 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

On one side we have people defending the pseudo-left and the other the radical right.

Isn't today April Fools day? It's fitting because you all look like fools to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

11:19 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

As oposed to you, who brought what to the discussion?...oh that's right...nothing. Thanks for the contribution.

Comment_arrow

JR

10:15 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Don't I know the constitutuion well enough to know that you can't force people to buy healthcare?...was your comment?
Well, four of five appelate courts felt it was constitutional, I would think they are a bit more up on the constitution than you. Two of the judges voting the act was constitutional are among the most often cited conservative judges. And the act is being appealed to the supreme court by people against the act that have LOST in the lower courts. We'll see if this activist court once again rules on party lines.

And please, virtually everybody on Obama's team wanted single-payer, but the tremendous lobbying by the insurance and AMA lobby, forced them to take it out.
The amazing thing is that the mandatory clause was originally suggested by a Republican foundation, was first put in effect by a Republican Governor, and supported by TONS of Republicans in congress. It was cited by them as a way to get deadbeats to pay their share, not just show up in an E.R. with no heath coverage and expect others to pay.
Once Obama adopted the idea, it suddenly became toxic, and the worst idea in the world. Total hypocrisy.

Securevelope

8:44 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

I'm not defending anyone. So sad that I have to continue to repeat myself.
All I did was make obvious what this article was implying.
My comments had nothing to do with politics yet those replying to me seem to think I am.
Again, let me be clear...I was commenting on the article, not politics.
If it were some cockamamie article written by a far right author I would feel the same way and point that out.

Why is this so hard for you all to understand?

Reply

Joe Wright

3:59 pm on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Griffiths are you kidding. Social Security constructed the way it is now is doomed to fail. You have NO idea what you are talking about. Read a book once in a while and stop spewing you political garabage.

You are nothing more than a political hack attempting to move a liberal big government agenda forward. I read what you write and laugh, whether it is about the teachers union or your plea to have civil politics while at the same time spewing more liberal propaganda in the same article. None of what you write is based in fact. You can post all the websites you want, they are editorial base and not based in fact. Here is one for you, the GAO and the former United States Comtroller General from 1998 to 2008, David Walker, both say Social Security is dooomed if not revamped. There findings are based in fact not propaganda that you continually quote in this blog. Your sources are slanted and not based in fact.
Thats ok. Time will tell, to keep the Social Security as is will signal the end of it as it and the county goes bankrupt. Here read a book that is researched factual with sources and research cited:

Comeback America: Turning the Country Around and Restoring Fiscal Responsibility. By David Walker

Reply

Bob Griffiths

10:28 pm on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Is this the same David Walker that advocates RAISING TAXES to address the long-term deficit? Maybe the far right doesn't like that part of his book, so they ignor it. Maybe you should read that part of his book again. No, I am not kidding about Social Security and Medicare, it must, and it will, become the core issue of this election cycle, especially if radical republicans in Congress like Paul Ryan continue to push the killing of Medicare under the guise of a budget proposal.

Reply

TP

9:25 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012

At Bob Griffiths- You're nothing but an liar or or just plain dumb. Spewing lies about the Paul Ryan plan that will give YOUNG people choices and those currently depending on Social Security & Medicare will be unaffected (except that his plan with put the programs back on the road to solvency rather than bankruptch and rationed care as you President has.) Quit your lies. People do your own research on this topic and don't listen to radical partisan like this man.

Reply

TP

8:50 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILJDudUpct0
Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers

Reply

Project Bluebeam

8:16 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012

Didn't the Obama budget just go down in flames 414 to 0? That means ZERO democrats voted for it. What does that tell you? Then there is the little matter of the democrat-controlled senate which has not passed ANY budget in 3 years!

Reply

TP

11:16 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Welcome to the future, where all your decisions are made by someone else, and any flimsy excuse can be used a weapon. But wait, there's more:

"While we are unable to comment on individual cases, we would like to assure patients there is a procedure GP practices need to follow before they can remove patients from their lists.”

Even the hospitals and doctors are not free to think and act independently. They have their overlords as well.

Well brother, you asked for it.
Surgery bans elderly patient over her carbon footprint - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk
An elderly woman was ordered to find a new GP because the “carbon footprint” of her two-mile round trips to the surgery where she had been treated for 30 years was too large...

Reply
Comment_arrow

BN

4:33 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Yeah, Obama is doing a "great" job! The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Obama took office. It has now hit $14.639 trillion...It's the most rapid increase in the debt under any U.S. president. To add insult to injury, the number of people NOT in the workforce is at an all-time high (88 million).

He wasted his 1st year in office forcing an illegal and unconstitutional healthcare bill down our throats while the economy grew exponentially worse. The stimulus that "had to pass immediately" wasn't so "shovel ready" after all, Gitmo is still open, Solyndra is bankrupt, the Muslim brotherhood is getting OUR $$$, He nixes the Keystone pipeline, and I'm still waiting for the revolving door of lobbyists to close at the white house.

Meanwhile, he divides the country further with false claims of sexism and racism. Not the hope and change we were counting on.

TP

9:31 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Here ya go:
http://www.citizenlink.com/2012/03/22/u-s-house-votes-to-eliminate-obamacare-panel/ - 38k
The REPUBLICAN controlled House of Representatives voted to eliminate the board created to essentially DENY CARE TO MEDICARE PATIENTS. It will, however, face an uphill battle to get enough votes to repeal it in the DEMOCRATE controlled Senate. Of course the DEMOCRATE President will veto it if it does pass. So the "Extreme" Leftwing is responsible for the rationing of care that will result if the panel is allowed to exist (along with the entire Obamacare law). Vote Republican to increase chances of repealing the devastating Obamacare law. More to come.

http://youtu.be/ieT6cymsldM - More on Obamacare - please share with other since the "so'called media" isn't doing it's job but rather acting as a cheerleader for the left.

More infringement on our rights by the party of Adler:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKbn1MdV79s&feature=share
Talk about extreme!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

10:48 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Here YOU go...Here's some faux news obama/muslim comments that you say doesn't exist.
BTW...Democrat, doesn't have an E at the end of it.

* http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bret-baier-factchecks-new-obama-book-no-fox-host-h

JR

10:55 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012

Sorry, the link above didn't contain the rebuttal link
http://youtu.be/astY6xIKJuA

Reply

TP

2:03 am on Sunday, April 8, 2012

A. The entire Doocy comment was not played. B. The comments by Hannity were all facts so what's the big deal. No one is supposed to mention all the muslim pandering and the American apology tour. Not to mention bowing to the Saudi King and now assisting the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Egypt, funneling 1.5 BILLION of our tax dollars to them and meeting with them in the White House (I'm sure there just a peace loving bunch). That was only the tip of the iceberg. As I said you as well as his other followers will suffer along with the rest of us if he's re-elected. Let me know if you find anymore typos.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JR

8:21 pm on Sunday, April 8, 2012

The entire Doocey comment made no change in the comment. Hannity tells so many lies in his show, it's impossible to keep count.
As far as bowing to foreign leaders, why don't you google it and you will see both eisenhower and nixon bowing to foreign leaders? But that would get in the way of your slanted narrative, wouldn't it? Want a link to BOTH bush's holding hands with the saudi King?
With Egypt, I suppose you would have preffered another US war in the middle east, with us invading egypt this time? Mubarek was going down either way, along with other dictators in the middle east, this one just happened to be an ally. Oppose the arab awakening and the US would make even MORE enemies there than bush has made. But then again, war is your first choice of response, correct?
Your biggest canard is the obama apology tour. Show me ONE speech where Obama used the word "apologize" in reference to America? this stems from a BS carl rove article from 2009 voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/.../obamas_apology_tour.ht

You republicans can't stand it that Obama has made us less hated in the rest of the world.

Rick Molinia

6:47 am on Sunday, April 8, 2012

anyone notice a GOOD QUALITY DOCTOR post a sign up saying " beginning April 1st, our office will only be accepting CASH or Debit."... i'd like every1 to have what they were promised, as well as each American who cannot afford to fix an important medical issue -Get some help.. but sadly nothing in in obama's plan helps a majority of people.... and dont knock FOX NEWS Brother... Your watching Commentary programs, so your gonna hear sum1's opinion...(atleast they always have 2 sides to argue it) i and @ 3pm & 7pm is an actual News program with Shepard Smith if u just want facts... if u were really "COOL" you would always watch RED EYE @ 3am!!! Take Care & Spike ya Hair
haters

Reply

Gavin Rozzi

9:10 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Bob, you're just regurgitating the typical bleeding heart liberal rhetoric. If anything is "medicare killing" it's the mess of healthcare legislation that Obama and friends rushed through. How do you really expect us to pay for this system. Wait, I know already. "Tax the rich!" Sure, that's a great idea, let's see how these policies work out.. Obamacare... Don't get sick ! This article is hypocrisy at its finest.

Reply

ted.dobracki

12:35 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

The recently passed social security payroll tax cut extension is a disaster. It was a bad idea to start with in December 2010 when Pelosi, Reid and Obama rammed it through during the lame duck seesion, and it is again after Boehner's concurrence!

If the "160 million" working people who are getting this tax cut don't pay it, who do the politicians think will pay for SS? The unemployed? Students? Those on welfare? The disabled? Students?

Reply

Bob G read something

12:35 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

I just read some of these comments. Griffiths you are in la la land. You quote a book that was mentioned by another poster and you forget that 95% of the book is about the reform of medicare, Social Security and the IRS then and only after the reform does David Walker advocate for tax CHANGE NOT REVENUE RAISING. CHANGE THE TAX CODE AND REFORM ENTITLEMENTS first. You and your liberal leftist don't like that part of the book so like every thing else you take it out of context.
You did not read the Ryan budget just the liberal propaganda about it. It does not kill any program. It protects those on the programs now and decelerates the growth of these entitlement programs. Again you are a propaganda spewer nothing more. Wake up we can not collect enough taxes to catch up to the growing deficit. Spending has to be reformed before taxes are raised.

Reply

Bob G read something

12:35 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Tax the rich ok Griffiths lets see the facts not the BS you spew:
White house says 22,000 make more than 1 mil
other sources say 100,000 make more than 1 mil
Politco says 225,000 make more than 1 mil

So lets take 1 million from each of these

White House number 22 bil
Others number 100 bil
politico number 225 bil
at 2pm today the debt number for last month was released it was 200 billion. Taking a milliion from the highest number of earners of one million covers one month of our national debt.
Our debt has increase 792 billion from 10/11 to 3/12(real numbers, facts not liberal propaganda) Our total debt is:

15.6 TRILLION . You can not collect enough taxes to pay that. Spending has to be cut.

Liberal politicians dont have a solution so they play bait and switch and say certain people make to much and they dont pay enough to those that do not make as much. They put up smoke screens and make the electorate think they have solutions.

I dont think that people making 1 million are going to limit the opportunities my children have. You know what is going to limit there opportunities 15.6 trillion in debt and counting!

and by the way Fiscal Responsibility aside, isnt it nice that we are becoming China's B****** .

Reply

Kathie Bottazzi

12:35 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Anyone who hasn't figured it out by now will obviously never figure it out, as agendas or partisan babble are more important than people, as is wildlife, etc. I plan on using my energy to help change the NJ Sex Offender Laws. Pediphiles, if i dare say. Tier 3s who are the worst offenders, have offended multiple times, and have been statistically proven to repeat their sick practices. However, in the State of NJ their rights are more important than the children they victimize. They are allowed to live near bus stops and schools or anywhere else for that matter, just let them know your here. The police force is only allowed to leave a notice at your door, stating that a Tier3 offender has moved in..no other information. I'm not talking about some 18-25 year old that was smitten with a teenagers charm (Tier 1) Real offenders, but they go to rehab and are called sick and can't be helped, you think. Move the sick one's to your neighborhood. Don't sell drugs by a school though, don't bring a gun near a school or anywhere else for that matter. Drop your gun at McDonald's that you may need to protect your family. Trade it in for a happy meal. Too many guns too, I'm sure the guy holding up the place came for a happy meal too..or maybe he shot the clerk and took the guns and the happy meals. Blah, Blah, Blah. Check out FL law on the subject..hint hint

Reply

Bob G read something

11:42 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Were is Bob. I guess when fact quoting time comes he disappears.
Here is a profile of a million dollar earner:
Small business owner with approx 10 to 20 employees
Payroll of approx 550 to 750 thousand not including his income( he pays payroll tax on this) and since these employees are productive citizens are taxpayers his business and payroll allows the government to collect their taxes. No business no payroll no taxes to collect.
Provides heath ins for approx 5-8 full time employees at approx 65,000 per year
Pays into SSI for his employees and into unemployment ins fund(last time I checked this was a tax)
Pays on his 1 million in income an average marginal tax rate of 21 percent
If his deductions are too high winds up pay AMT which is a higher tax
Pays 15 percent on any capital gains from investments
Pays 15 percent on qualified dividends he earns
In NJ pays apprx 12,000 per year in property taxes
Pays corporate taxes depending how his business is structured. .....
Depending on the type of business he or she can be subject to a multitude of other annoying taxes and fees.
Now lets take a close look at things.
47 percent of the population pays NO taxes to the Federal government and citizens that collect some type of entitlement is approaching 50 percent of the population. Of this 50 percent who knows how many really cant make a living and how many just dont want to. Yeah but the guy or gal making 1 mil creating jobs needs to pay more. Get real.

Reply

Kathie Bottazzi

2:25 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

"We cannot always build the future for our youth, but we can build our youth for the future" - Franklin D Roosevelt

"We can afford all that we need; but cannot afford all that we want" - Franklin D Roosevelt

Reply

Gerard Gibson

3:57 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Mr. Griffiths,

I am a 36 year old, Hispanic male. People that think like you believe that people like me must believe what you do also. So let me tell you what "I" believe without any "outside" interference...
1) I believe that people that have worked their entire life paying into a "broken" system should have no change to the status quo.
2) I believe that "forcing" me and my generation to continue paying into a broken system is ridiculous.
3) Allow me to "Opt Out" of said broken system and put "MY OWN MONEY" to work for my own future.
4) I've been paying into this system since I was 16 years old. That's 20 years. Everything I have paid into it so far... KEEP IT!!! Just let me out now!

Reply

bob migliaccio

8:21 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

Same old tired democratic talking point. I remember as a kid listening to my dad and uncles argue the same issue--republicans are going to starve the elderly and children--take away your SS-bla bla bla.. Democrats are cowards--they know these programs are in trouble yet do nothing in order to keep the voting base. That is so much worse than anything Ryan has proposed...

Reply

lacey taxpayer

9:48 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

@ tp just because someone states an opposing viewpoint that doesnt automatically make them a "liar" and "plain dumb" . isnt "tp" actually tim o connor who was banned from the patch for constantly using personal insults and racial comments? as for ferad gibson you can always opt out just don't collect your social security when you retire. very easy to do

Reply

lacey taxpayer

9:48 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

and jr you are correct . hannity is the worst there is on tv. this week alone he had sarah palin as co host. all those conservatives who claim to be so smart actually voted for someone who had to write "lower taxes" on the palm of her hand. so you can see where theyre all coming from.

Reply

bob migliaccio

11:22 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

No Lacey Taxpayer--we cannot "opt out" of SS--and to say he could choose not to collect what he was forced to put in is not being serious. How about letting us invest ourmoney the way we wish--it is our money-correct?

Reply

lacey taxpayer

1:22 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

bob people have been paying into social security for decades .and the many people who did are counting on social security to be paid into by those who will collect it later. ss is secure until 2036. until then and we have a better answer this is it. just because you don't feel like it anymore doesnt mean you can stop paying social security. you know what i pay almost half my paycheck in taxes every week. i,m tired of doing that too. i,m simply not going to pay taxes anymore . lets see how that works out for me and since you think its a novel idea why don't you refuse to pay all taxes as well.? its time for you to put the grown up pants on and stop tearing away at the basics millions of seniors and disabled count on to survive.

Reply

lacey taxpayer

1:22 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

and by bob i mean bobby migliccio

Reply

bob migliaccio

1:52 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012

I don't know who this is but please dont tell me to put on my big boy pants--I've been thinking for myself for a few years thank you. As for your typical rant on how your SS will be taken away in some way please know this--both of my parents were disabled--they relied on both SS and medicare--so I am not tearing away anything from anyone. To say we should not in some way reform these programs now because as you said "they are fine until 2036" is just a cop-out. We can insure that current benefits are paid while strengthening it for the younger generation and making sure it's solvent. And enough with "we been paying for decades"---so have people my age....

Reply

L

10:26 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

"The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office says in a report to be released Monday that the $8.3 billion the administration has earmarked for quality bonuses to Medicare Advantage insurance plans would postpone the pain of cuts to the plans under the new health care law. Most of the money would go to plans rated merely average."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/23/government-auditors-call-for-end-to-8-million-medicare-bonus-program/#ixzz1ss5Maa31

Reply

Lori Morrison

11:49 am on Monday, April 23, 2012

Elected officials in Washington receive a large salary, full benefits and a large pension all because we, the people elected them. If they had to pay for their own benefits, did not take a pension and put that money back into the social security and medicare program, it would fix the problem. They are elected to serve the people both young and old. Government "welfare" needs to end

Reply

mr t

1:25 am on Friday, April 27, 2012

bob g read something so i take it youre voting for romney who was 47th out of 50 states in job creation as gov of mass. and bn do you actually believe that the keystone pipeline will lower gas prices? lol it will raise gas prices as reported in trans canada's own 2008 report. by by passing the midwest and exporting oil overseas from tax free zones in the gulf it will raise gas prices . its amazing how you guys never get the memo.the only oil america will see from keystone is the oil it leaks from substandard steel pipes made in india. how many americans are working in india on this pipe?

Reply

messages from newt's moon base

11:23 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012

earth to project moonbeam how can you manage to get it so wrong everytime.? despite what sean hannity told you to think the budget that was voted down was the budget that was from this past feb. obama has made major changes to a new version of it and dems are going to submit it when complete. moonbeam you better check for a carbon monoxide leak in your apt. no one could be this daffy without being starved of oxygen to the brain. lol

Reply

Leave a comment